[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180122134607.00d77101@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:46:07 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Mutli-directory module Makefiles
Hi!
in drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp there is a module which is built
from C sources in 4 directories. What is the best way to handle that?
Currently we just add all the objects in one Makefile:
nfp-objs := \
nfpcore/nfp6000_pcie.o \
nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.o \
etc.
However, this makes it impossible to build a single object in subdirs:
$ make drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.o
scripts/Makefile.build:45: drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/Makefile'. Stop.
Documentation/kbuild/modules.txt also contains an unclear remark that
this is not recommended (or is it about the use of $(src)?):
--- 4.3 Several Subdirectories
...
To build the module complex.ko, we then need the following
kbuild file:
--> filename: Kbuild
obj-m := complex.o
complex-y := src/complex_main.o
complex-y += src/hal/hardwareif.o
ccflags-y := -I$(src)/include
ccflags-y += -I$(src)/src/hal/include
As you can see, kbuild knows how to handle object files located
in other directories. The trick is to specify the directory
relative to the kbuild file's location. **That being said, this
is NOT recommended practice.**
Making the include optional would work:
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ save-cflags := $(CFLAGS)
# The filename Kbuild has precedence over Makefile
kbuild-dir := $(if $(filter /%,$(src)),$(src),$(srctree)/$(src))
kbuild-file := $(if $(wildcard $(kbuild-dir)/Kbuild),$(kbuild-dir)/Kbuild,$(kbuild-dir)/Makefile)
-include $(kbuild-file)
+-include $(kbuild-file)
# If the save-* variables changed error out
ifeq ($(KBUILD_NOPEDANTIC),)
Or we could create empty Makefiles in subdirectories... Is there a
better way of handling this? Which is preferred?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists