[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1516700314.12197.48.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 17:38:34 +0800
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew-sh Cheng <andrew-sh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: Add mediatek related projects into
blacklist
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 09:46 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:31:11PM +0800, sean.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > commit 6066998cbd2b1012a8d5bc9a2957cfd0ad53150e upstream.
> >
> > commit edeec420de24 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Automatically create cpufreq
> > device with OPP v2") not added MediaTek SoCs to the blacklist that would
> > lead to cause an occasional hang or unexpected behaviors on related boards
> > as kernelci reported and complained on [1] specifically for 4.14 and 4.15
> > tree.
> >
> > For those reasons, add MediaTek SoCs into cpufreq-dt blacklist and wish
> > the patch be applied to 4.14 and 4.15 tree to allow kernelci able to
> > complete following automated kernel testing.
> >
> > [1] https://kernelci.org/boot/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2/
> >
> > Fixes: edeec420de24 (cpufreq: dt-cpufreq: platdev Automatically create device with OPP v2)
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew-sh Cheng <andrew-sh.cheng@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> What stable kernel tree(s) are you wanting this backported to?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, Greg,
thanks for your help!
stable and stable-rc are those trees I want this backported to
Hi, Viresh
currently, can the patch be permitted to go through tree linux-pm branch
master to be part of mainline?
Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists