[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1516705426.7870.45.camel@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:03:46 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
shawnguo@...nel.org, Anson.Huang@....com, ping.bai@....com,
linux-imx@....com, fabio.estevam@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 01/10] clk: clk-divider: add CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE
clk support
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 21:11 +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index f711be6..68ccd36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ struct clk_div_table {
> * @shift: shift to the divider bit field
> * @width: width of the divider bit field
> * @table: array of value/divider pairs, last entry should have div = 0
> + * @cached_val: cached div hw value used for CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE
> * @lock: register lock
> *
> * Clock with an adjustable divider affecting its output frequency. Implements
> @@ -388,6 +389,12 @@ struct clk_div_table {
> * CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO - For dividers which are like CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED
> * except when the value read from the register is zero, the divisor is
> * 2^width of the field.
> + * CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE - For dividers which are like CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED
Unless I missed something in your patch, this comment says that, like
CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO, CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE behave as a CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED
clock
However, I don't see anything special done in _get_val() around
CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE which means that calling _get_val() with div=2 would give
val=1. This is more like a regular divider (when CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED is not
set)
Also, when looking for the best divider, CCF could find that the best div is 1.
On a non-CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED, this would translate to value 0 and
(accidentally) gate the clock .
all the occurrences of CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE I have seen in patch 9 are combined
with CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED, which is probably why this potential issue has gone
unnoticed.
I think CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE should just means that value 0 gate the clock, and
just that. It should not imply what the rest of values mean.
In a more general way, I'd love to see a feature such as CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE
added to the divider but I'm bit concerned of all the quirks we are slowly
adding to the generic divider. It seems we are all trying re-use the algorithm
of clk_divider_bestdiv() with different 'val-to-div' transfer function. Not too
sure what the best solution could be though.
> + * when the value read from the register is zero, it means the divisor
> + * is gated. For this case, the cached_val will be used to store the
> + * intermediate div for the normal rate operation, like set_rate/get_rate/
> + * recalc_rate. When the divider is ungated, the driver will actually
> + * program the hardware to have the requested divider value.
> */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists