[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180123131203.bdhlqdqabhtwnipi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:12:03 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tpm: add longer timeouts for creation commands.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> TPM2_CC_Create(0x153) and TPM2_CC_CreatePrimary (0x131) involve generation
> of crypto keys which can be a computationally intensive task.
> The timeout is set to 3min.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
>From where are these numbers are derived from?
Can you send 1/3 and 2/3 as a separate patch set with a cover
letter (with explanation) and this as a separate patch? This
is unrelated to first two changes albeit might make sense.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists