[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d120bslq.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:41:05 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"kbuild-all\@01.org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel\@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/hyper-v: reenlightenment notifications support
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> writes:
> "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You added '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' to mshyperv.h which is included in
>>> vclock_gettime.c and pulls in other stuff which fails to expand....
>>
>> Is the declaration of hyperv_reenlightenment_intr() even needed in
>> mshyperv.h? The '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' is there for the __irq_entry
>> annotation on that declaration. There's a declaration of the parallel (and
>> unannotated) hyperv_vector_handler(), but that looks like a fossil that
>> isn't needed either.
>>
>
> True,
>
> the only need for the declaration in mshyperv.h is to silence "warning:
> no previous prototype for ‘hyperv_reenlightenment_intr’"; I'm not sure
> if this actually needs fixing.
It seems we can get away with dropping '__visible' and '__irq_entry'
qualifiers from 'hyperv_reenlightenment_intr' declaration in mshyperv.h
while keeping them in hv_init.c for the implementation. This way we can
avoid the nasty 'no previous prototype' warning and not have to add
'#include <linux/interrupt.h>' to mshyperv.h breaking vdso.
I'm inclined to go ahead with this in v4 if nobody objects.
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists