[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e00cd68-ff9a-37e1-3e38-f0e58ae4a400@mips.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:58:06 +0000
From: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...s.com>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
CC: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...s.com>,
"# v4 . 11" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: fix incorrect mem=X@Y handling
Hi
On 21/12/17 21:00, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> From: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...s.com>
>
> Change 73fbc1eba7ff added a fix to ensure that the memory range between
> PHYS_OFFSET and low memory address specified by mem= cmdline argument is
> not later processed by free_all_bootmem.
> This change was incorrect for systems where the commandline specifies
> more than 1 mem argument, as it will cause all memory between
> PHYS_OFFSET and each of the memory offsets to be marked as reserved,
> which results in parts of the RAM marked as reserved (Creator CI20's
> u-boot has a default commandline argument 'mem=256M@0x0
> mem=768M@...0000000').
>
> Change the behaviour to ensure that only the range between PHYS_OFFSET
> and the lowest start address of the memories is marked as protected.
>
> This change also ensures that the range is marked protected even if it's
> only defined through the devicetree and not only via commandline
> arguments.
>
> Reported-by: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...s.com>
> Fixes: 73fbc1eba7ff ("MIPS: fix mem=X@Y commandline processing")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.11
Tested on:
Creator Ci20
Creator Ci40
MIPS Boston
UTM8 (Cavium Octeon III)
It certainly fixes the ci20 when it's factory default command line args
of "mem=256M@0x0 mem=768M@...0000000" are passed. Though those arguments
appear redundant since without them both memory regions are detected
through device tree instead, and there is no problem.
Tested-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...s.com>
> ---
> v2: Use updated email adress, add tag for stable.
> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> index 702c678de116..f19d61224c71 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
> unsigned long reserved_end;
> unsigned long mapstart = ~0UL;
> unsigned long bootmap_size;
> + phys_addr_t ramstart = ~0UL;
> bool bootmap_valid = false;
> int i;
>
> @@ -395,6 +396,21 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
> max_low_pfn = 0;
>
> /*
> + * Reserve any memory between the start of RAM and PHYS_OFFSET
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) {
> + if (boot_mem_map.map[i].type != BOOT_MEM_RAM)
> + continue;
> +
> + ramstart = min(ramstart, boot_mem_map.map[i].addr);
> + }
> +
> + if (ramstart > PHYS_OFFSET)
> + add_memory_region(PHYS_OFFSET, ramstart - PHYS_OFFSET,
> + BOOT_MEM_RESERVED);
> +
> +
> + /*
> * Find the highest page frame number we have available.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < boot_mem_map.nr_map; i++) {
> @@ -664,9 +680,6 @@ static int __init early_parse_mem(char *p)
>
> add_memory_region(start, size, BOOT_MEM_RAM);
>
> - if (start && start > PHYS_OFFSET)
> - add_memory_region(PHYS_OFFSET, start - PHYS_OFFSET,
> - BOOT_MEM_RESERVED);
> return 0;
> }
> early_param("mem", early_parse_mem);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists