[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180123072533.GA17566@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:25:33 +0100
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: backport Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self to stable
kernels?
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:06:29PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Zhang, Ning A <ning.a.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
> > hello, Greg, Andy, Thomas
> >
> > would you like to backport these two patches to LTS kernel?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h?h=v4.14.14&id=1c52d859cb2d417e7216d3e56bb7fea88444cec9
> >
> > x86/asm/32: Make sync_core() handle missing CPUID on all 32-bit kernels
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h?h=v4.14.14&id=c198b121b1a1d7a7171770c634cd49191bac4477
> >
> > x86/asm: Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self
> >
>
> I'd be in favor of backporting
> 1c52d859cb2d417e7216d3e56bb7fea88444cec9. I see no compelling reason
> to backport the other one, since it doesn't fix a bug. Greg, can you
> do this?
I'll work on this after this round of stable kernels are released.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists