[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1801231833550.1761@schleppi>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:37:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, corbet@....net,
oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390/cmf: fix kerneldoc
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Make sure we use proper Return sections, and make the output
> for cmf_enable() less odd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> ---
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
> @@ -1118,9 +1118,10 @@ int ccw_set_cmf(struct ccw_device *cdev, int enable)
> * enable_cmf() - switch on the channel measurement for a specific device
> * @cdev: The ccw device to be enabled
> *
> - * Returns %0 for success or a negative error value.
> - * Note: If this is called on a device for which channel measurement is already
> - * enabled a reset of the measurement data is triggered.
> + * Enable channel measurements for @cdev. If this is called on a device
> + * for which channel measurement is already enabled a reset of the
> + * measurement data is triggered.
> + * Returns: %0 for success or a negative error value
^
I took the liberty to do re-add the dot at the end..
Applied. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists