[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180123224956.GQ7844@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:49:56 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict
Indirect Branch Speculation
> Not sure. Maybe to start, the answer might be to allow it to be set for
> the ultra-paranoid, but in general don't enable it by default. Having it
> enabled would be an alternative to someone deciding to disable SMT, since
> that would have even more of a performance impact.
I agree. A reasonable strategy would be to only enable it for
processes that have dumpable disabled. This should be already set for
high value processes like GPG, and allows others to opt-in if
they need to.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists