linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180123232235.GT7844@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:22:35 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc:     "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "ashok.raj@...el.com" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@...zon.de>,
        "arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
        "arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        "tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "aarcange@...hat.com" <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
        "mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "asit.k.mallick@...el.com" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
        "jun.nakajima@...el.com" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
        "labbott@...hat.com" <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict
 Indirect Branch Speculation

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:14:36PM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 14:49 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Not sure.  Maybe to start, the answer might be to allow it to be set for
> > > the ultra-paranoid, but in general don't enable it by default.  Having it
> > > enabled would be an alternative to someone deciding to disable SMT, since
> > > that would have even more of a performance impact.
> > 
> > I agree. A reasonable strategy would be to only enable it for
> > processes that have dumpable disabled. This should be already set for
> > high value processes like GPG, and allows others to opt-in if
> > they need to.
> 
> That seems to make sense, and I think was the solution we were
> approaching for IBPB on context switch too, right?

Right.

-Andi