[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <993840d6-112c-215a-8b28-53affa1e7a76@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:41:39 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Cc: cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consequences from the usage
of at signs in Python strings
> So it works, but you are complaining anyway?
How serious do you interpret such information in the SmPL manual?
>> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/bf1c6a5869dd324f5faeeaa3a12d57270e478b21/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L50
>>
>> “…
>> Furthermore, @ should not be used in this code.
…
>> …”
>
> I guess the conclusion is that it woks in strings (which are pretty
> universal) and not in comments (which are language specific).
Would you like to achieve any safer data processing for potentially “reserved” characters?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists