[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17f80dc5-126e-bf1e-8bcc-95a1e66cd271@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:37:20 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Allow ACPI_I2C_OPREGION if I2C is built as a
module
On 1/24/2018 10:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> There must be a middle ground somewhere.
>
> One thing which comes to mind is to simply not allow building i2c as a module
> when ACPI is selected, something like this should work I think:
>
> config I2C
> tristate "I2C support"
> select RT_MUTEXES
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> + # force building I2C in on ACPI systems, for opregion availability
> + depends on y || !ACPI
This works for me.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists