| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1516863704-21364-5-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:01:44 +0800
From: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: zhong.weidong@....com.cn, Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>,
Tan Hu <tan.hu@....com.cn>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V4 5/5] workqueue: introduce a way to set workqueue's scheduler
When pinning RT threads to specific cores using CPU affinity, the
kworkers on the same CPU would starve, which may lead to some kind
of priority inversion. In that case, the RT threads would also
suffer high performance impact.
The priority inversion looks like,
CPU 0: libvirtd acquired cgroup_mutex, and triggered
lru_add_drain_per_cpu, then waiting for all the kworkers to complete:
PID: 44145 TASK: ffff8807bec7b980 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "libvirtd"
#0 [ffff8807f2cbb9d0] __schedule at ffffffff816410ed
#1 [ffff8807f2cbba38] schedule at ffffffff81641789
#2 [ffff8807f2cbba48] schedule_timeout at ffffffff8163f479
#3 [ffff8807f2cbbaf8] wait_for_completion at ffffffff81641b56
#4 [ffff8807f2cbbb58] flush_work at ffffffff8109efdc
#5 [ffff8807f2cbbbd0] lru_add_drain_all at ffffffff81179002
#6 [ffff8807f2cbbc08] migrate_prep at ffffffff811c77be
#7 [ffff8807f2cbbc18] do_migrate_pages at ffffffff811b8010
#8 [ffff8807f2cbbcf8] cpuset_migrate_mm at ffffffff810fea6c
#9 [ffff8807f2cbbd10] cpuset_attach at ffffffff810ff91e
#10 [ffff8807f2cbbd50] cgroup_attach_task at ffffffff810f9972
#11 [ffff8807f2cbbe08] attach_task_by_pid at ffffffff810fa520
#12 [ffff8807f2cbbe58] cgroup_tasks_write at ffffffff810fa593
#13 [ffff8807f2cbbe68] cgroup_file_write at ffffffff810f8773
#14 [ffff8807f2cbbef8] vfs_write at ffffffff811dfdfd
#15 [ffff8807f2cbbf38] sys_write at ffffffff811e089f
#16 [ffff8807f2cbbf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff8164c809
CPU 43: kworker/43 starved because of the RT threads:
CURRENT: PID: 21294 TASK: ffff883fd2d45080 COMMAND: "lwip"
RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff883fff3f4950
[ 79] PID: 21294 TASK: ffff883fd2d45080 COMMAND: "lwip"
[ 79] PID: 21295 TASK: ffff88276d481700 COMMAND: "ovdk-ovsvswitch"
[ 79] PID: 21351 TASK: ffff8807be822280 COMMAND: "dispatcher"
[ 79] PID: 21129 TASK: ffff8807bef0f300 COMMAND: "ovdk-ovsvswitch"
[ 79] PID: 21337 TASK: ffff88276d482e00 COMMAND: "handler_3"
[ 79] PID: 21352 TASK: ffff8807be824500 COMMAND: "flow_dumper"
[ 79] PID: 21336 TASK: ffff88276d480b80 COMMAND: "handler_2"
[ 79] PID: 21342 TASK: ffff88276d484500 COMMAND: "handler_8"
[ 79] PID: 21341 TASK: ffff88276d482280 COMMAND: "handler_7"
[ 79] PID: 21338 TASK: ffff88276d483980 COMMAND: "handler_4"
[ 79] PID: 21339 TASK: ffff88276d480000 COMMAND: "handler_5"
[ 79] PID: 21340 TASK: ffff88276d486780 COMMAND: "handler_6"
CFS RB_ROOT: ffff883fff3f4868
[120] PID: 37959 TASK: ffff88276e148000 COMMAND: "kworker/43:1"
CPU 28: Systemd(Victim) was blocked by cgroup_mutex:
PID: 1 TASK: ffff883fd2d40000 CPU: 28 COMMAND: "systemd"
#0 [ffff881fd317bd60] __schedule at ffffffff816410ed
#1 [ffff881fd317bdc8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffff81642869
#2 [ffff881fd317bdd8] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffff81640565
#3 [ffff881fd317be38] mutex_lock at ffffffff8163f9cf
#4 [ffff881fd317be50] proc_cgroup_show at ffffffff810fd256
#5 [ffff881fd317be98] seq_read at ffffffff81203cda
#6 [ffff881fd317bf08] vfs_read at ffffffff811dfc6c
#7 [ffff881fd317bf38] sys_read at ffffffff811e07bf
#8 [ffff881fd317bf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff81
The simplest way to fix that is to set the scheduler of kworkers to
higher RT priority, just like,
chrt --fifo -p 61 <kworker_pid>
However, it can not avoid other WORK_CPU_BOUND worker threads running
and starving.
This patch introduces a way to set the scheduler(policy and priority)
of percpu worker_pool, in that way, user could set proper scheduler
policy and priority of the worker_pool as needed, which could apply
to all the WORK_CPU_BOUND workers on the same CPU. On the other hand,
we could using /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/cpumask for
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND workers to prevent them starving.
Tejun Heo suggested:
"* Add scheduler type to wq_attrs so that unbound workqueues can be
configured.
* Rename system_wq's wq->name from "events" to "system_percpu", and
similarly for the similarly named workqueues.
* Enable wq_attrs (only the applicable part should show up in the
interface) for system_percpu and system_percpu_highpri, and use that
to change the attributes of the percpu pools."
This patch implements the basic infrastructure and /sys interface,
such as:
# cat /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/system_percpu/sched_attr
policy=0 prio=0 nice=0
# echo "policy=1 prio=1 nice=0" > /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/system_percpu/sched_attr
# cat /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/system_percpu/sched_attr
policy=1 prio=1 nice=0
# cat /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/system_percpu_highpri/sched_attr
policy=0 prio=0 nice=-20
# echo "policy=1 prio=2 nice=0" > /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/system_percpu_highpri/sched_attr
# cat /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/system_percpu_highpri/sched_attr
policy=1 prio=2 nice=0
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tan Hu <tan.hu@....com.cn>
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 8c5aba5..7eb33b5 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3194,7 +3194,10 @@ static u32 wqattrs_hash(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
u32 hash = 0;
- hash = jhash_1word(attrs->sched_attr.sched_nice, hash);
+ hash = jhash_3words(attrs->sched_attr.sched_policy,
+ attrs->sched_attr.sched_priority,
+ attrs->sched_attr.sched_nice,
+ hash);
hash = jhash(cpumask_bits(attrs->cpumask),
BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_cpumask_bits) * sizeof(long), hash);
return hash;
@@ -3216,7 +3219,7 @@ static bool sched_attr_equal(const struct sched_attr *a,
static bool wqattrs_equal(const struct workqueue_attrs *a,
const struct workqueue_attrs *b)
{
- if (a->sched_attr.sched_nice != b->sched_attr.sched_nice)
+ if (!sched_attr_equal(&a->sched_attr, &b->sched_attr))
return false;
if (!cpumask_equal(a->cpumask, b->cpumask))
return false;
@@ -4362,7 +4365,9 @@ static void pr_cont_pool_info(struct worker_pool *pool)
pr_cont(" cpus=%*pbl", nr_cpumask_bits, pool->attrs->cpumask);
if (pool->node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
pr_cont(" node=%d", pool->node);
- pr_cont(" flags=0x%x nice=%d", pool->flags,
+ pr_cont(" flags=0x%x policy=%u prio=%u nice=%d", pool->flags,
+ pool->attrs->sched_attr.sched_policy,
+ pool->attrs->sched_attr.sched_priority,
pool->attrs->sched_attr.sched_nice);
}
@@ -5105,6 +5110,42 @@ static int wq_set_unbound_sched_attr(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
return ret;
}
+static int wq_set_bound_sched_attr(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const struct sched_attr *new)
+{
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct worker *worker;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ apply_wqattrs_lock();
+ for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
+ pool = pwq->pool;
+ mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
+ for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
+ ret = sched_setattr(worker->task, new);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s:%d err[%d]",
+ __func__, __LINE__, ret);
+ pr_err(" worker[%s] policy[%d] prio[%d] nice[%d]\n",
+ worker->task->comm,
+ new->sched_policy,
+ new->sched_priority,
+ new->sched_nice);
+ }
+ }
+ copy_sched_attr(&pool->attrs->sched_attr, new);
+ mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
+ }
+ apply_wqattrs_unlock();
+
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ copy_sched_attr(&wq->attrs->sched_attr, new);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static ssize_t sched_attr_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
@@ -5120,8 +5161,10 @@ static ssize_t sched_attr_store(struct device *dev,
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
return -EPERM;
- if (sscanf(buf, "policy=0 prio=0 nice=%d",
- &new.sched_nice) != 1)
+ if (sscanf(buf, "policy=%u prio=%u nice=%d",
+ &new.sched_policy,
+ &new.sched_priority,
+ &new.sched_nice) != 3)
return -EINVAL;
pr_debug("set wq's sched_attr: policy=%u prio=%u nice=%d\n",
@@ -5138,7 +5181,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_attr_store(struct device *dev,
if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
ret = wq_set_unbound_sched_attr(wq, &new);
else
- ret = -EPERM;
+ ret = wq_set_bound_sched_attr(wq, &new);
return ret ?: count;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(sched_attr);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists