lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A69B065.30501@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 18:24:37 +0800
From:   JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To:     Randy Li <randy.li@...k-chips.com>, tfiga@...omium.org
CC:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, xxm@...k-chips.com,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, jcliang@...omium.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] iommu/rockchip: Control clocks needed to access
 the IOMMU

On 01/25/2018 05:42 PM, Randy Li wrote:
>>>
>>
>> confirmed with Simon, there might be some iommus don't have a pd, and
> We use the pd to control the NIU node(not on upstream), without a pd or
> fake pd, none of the platform would work.
after talked offline, it's possible to have iommu without pd in upstream 
kernel(and chromeos kernel), but on our internal kernel, the drivers 
would require pd(or fake pd) to reset modules when error happens.

anyway, i think that means we do need clock control here.

>> the CONFIG_PM could be disabled.I am hard to believe a modern platform
>> can work without that.
>>
>> so it might be better to control clocks in iommu driver itself.
>I won't
> insist how the version of the iommu patch on the upstream, I
> just post an idea here.
> The version for kernel 4.4 is under internal review, the implementation
> has been modified many times.
>
> I would suggest the managing clocks in pd is a more easy way and don't
> need to spare those thing in two places.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ