[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180125120348.ss62p5yaviemprxn@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:03:48 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: arjan@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, karahmed@...zon.de,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
ashok.raj@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] x86/speculation: Add basic IBPB (Indirect Branch
Prediction Barrier) support
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:58:20AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> They're immediates, not registers. So it's like the first example in...
Oh, I know very well what they are - I simply find the macro more
readable if there are less or no arguments.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists