| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <928cb0c9-1d7a-3d0c-0538-a8bb0e2a86b1@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:15:21 +0800
From: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <sudeep.holla@....com>,
<hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<jhugo@...eaurora.org>, <Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com>,
<ahs3@...hat.com>, <Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com>,
<austinwc@...eaurora.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<vkilari@...eaurora.org>, <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/12] arm64: topology: enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU
topology
Hi Jeremy,
I have tested the patch with the newest UEFI. It prints the below error:
[ 4.017371] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.021069] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.024764] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.028460] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.032153] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.035849] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.039543] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.043239] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.046932] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.050629] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 4.054322] BUG: arch topology borken
I checked the code and found that the newest UEFI set PPTT physical_package_flag on a physical package node and
the NUMA domain (SRAT domains) starts from the layer of DIE. (The topology of our board is core->cluster->die->package).
When the kernel starts to build sched_domain, the multi-core sched_domain contains all the cores within a package,
and the lowest NUMA sched_domain contains all the cores within a die. But the kernel requires that the multi-core
sched_domain should be a subset of the lowest NUMA sched_domain, so the BUG info is printed.
If we modify the UEFI to make NUMA sched_domain start from the layer of package, then all the topology information
within the package will be discarded. I think we need to build the multi-core sched_domain using the cores within
the cluster instead of the cores within the package. I think that's what 'multi-core' means. Multi cores form a cluster. I guess.
If we build the multi-core sched_domain using the cores within a cluster, I think we need to add fields in struct cpu_topology
to record which cores are in each cluster.
Thanks,
Xiongfeng
On 2018/1/13 8:59, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Propagate the topology information from the PPTT tree to the
> cpu_topology array. We can get the thread id, core_id and
> cluster_id by assuming certain levels of the PPTT tree correspond
> to those concepts. The package_id is flagged in the tree and can be
> found by calling find_acpi_cpu_topology_package() which terminates
> its search when it finds an ACPI node flagged as the physical
> package. If the tree doesn't contain enough levels to represent
> all of the requested levels then the root node will be returned
> for all subsequent levels.
>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 7b06e263fdd1..ce8ec7fd6b32 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> * for more details.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/arch_topology.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> @@ -300,6 +302,46 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +/*
> + * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
> + * cpu_topology array.
> + */
> +static int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> +{
> + bool is_threaded;
> + int cpu, topology_id;
> +
> + is_threaded = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
> + if (topology_id < 0)
> + return topology_id;
> +
> + if (is_threaded) {
> + cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
> + } else {
> + cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static inline int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> @@ -309,6 +351,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> * Discard anything that was parsed if we hit an error so we
> * don't use partial information.
> */
> - if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
> + if ((!acpi_disabled) && parse_acpi_topology())
> + reset_cpu_topology();
> + else if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
> reset_cpu_topology();
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists