linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180125155110.mw655b7fwgm7qqc7@pd.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:51:10 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        pjt@...gle.com, jikos@...nel.org, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com,
        luto@...capital.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, keescook@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:10:24AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Huh?  GCC doesn't even look inside the inline asm.  That's why we had to
> implement ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT.

That wasn't very correct. What I meant was: *we* need to tell gcc that
the inline asm *might* clobber registers and which those might be. What
David suggested with ASM_NO_INPUT_CLOBBER is the proper thing to do.

> And the seg fault is objtool's way of telling you you need a
> ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE above the alternative ;-)

Except that it blew up when I did this which doesn't have ALTERNATIVE
(it's the diff I saved :-))

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 390b3dc3d438..16cc2e73d17d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -281,3 +281,19 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev,
 	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled]);
 }
 #endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+void __fill_rsb_nop(void)
+{
+	cpu_relax();
+}
+
+void __fill_rsb(void)
+{
+	unsigned long loops;
+
+	asm volatile (__stringify(__FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(%0, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, %1))
+		      : "=r" (loops), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+		      : : "memory" );
+}
+#endif
--

> (I know that's not the best answer, will fix it soon.)

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.