[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180125171549.GA21946@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:15:55 +0000
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: memcontrol: charge allocated memory after
mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:03:02PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:19:11 +0000
>
> > @@ -476,6 +477,10 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, bool kern)
> > spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
> > }
> > mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
> > + amt = sk_memory_allocated(newsk);
> > + if (amt && newsk->sk_memcg)
> > + mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(newsk->sk_memcg, amt);
> > +
>
> This looks confusing to me.
>
> sk_memory_allocated() is the total amount of memory used by all
> sockets for a particular "struct proto", not just for that specific
> socket.
Oh, I see...
>
> Maybe I don't understand how this socket memcg stuff works, but it
> seems like you should be looking instead at how much memory is
> allocated to this specific socket.
Yes, this is what I wanted to do originally.
Let me find a proper way to do this.
Thank you!
Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists