linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB/mthca: Fix how mthca_map_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180125175048.GG10706@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:50:48 -0700
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, roland@...estorage.com,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mthca: Fix how mthca_map_user_db() calls gup

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:34:23AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > - Should I be wrong about no callers already holding mmap_sem,
> >   I still think calling gup without the mutex makes sense for
> >   improved paralellism. Now, if callers can hold the mmap_sem,
> >   it's wrong to do copy_from_user right before calling mthca_map_user_db.
> 
> So, if I understand you correctly, we (well, you and Al would be more
> correct, we haven't looked into the situation yet, so Mellanox people
> that worked on this in the day might now, or someone taking the time to
> research it could find out) don't have a clear understanding of all the
> conditions this function is called under, and so we actually don't know
> what the best way forward is to fix it?

I looked at it enough to be confident that mthca_map_user_db is never
called with mmap_sem held.

Also pretty confident that mthca_unmap_user_db is never called with
mmap_sem.

So how about just grabbing mmap_sem around the call to get_user_pages
and no other changes?

Jason