[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <KL1P15301MB0006FE067F7BD7601F30BCFDBFE10@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:00:23 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Dexuan-Linux Cui <dexuan.linux@...il.com>
CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: tip/master falls off NOP cliff with KPTI under KVM
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@...radead.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 23:53
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 16:53 -0800, Dexuan-Linux Cui wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Woodhouse, David
> <dwmw@...zon.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 01:34 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bisection points to
> > > >
> > > > f3433c1010c6af61c9897f0f0447f81b991feac1 is the first bad
> commit
> > > > commit f3433c1010c6af61c9897f0f0447f81b991feac1
> > > > Author: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> > > > Date: Tue Jan 9 14:43:11 2018 +0000
> > > >
> > > > x86/retpoline/entry: Convert entry assembler indirect jumps
> > > Thanks. We've fixed the underlying problem with the alternatives
> > > mechanism, *and* changed the retpoline code not to actually rely on
> > > said fix.
> > Hi David and all,
> > It looks the latest upstream tree did fix the issue.
> > Can you please specify the related commit(s) that fixed the issue?
> > I need to cherry-pick the fix. I suppose a quick reply from you would save
> > me a lot of time. :-)
>
> Hi Dexuan,
>
> The above commit didn't ever make it into Linus' tree in that form; the
> issues were fixed beforehand. So there isn't a subsequent commit that
> fixes it. I think it might have just been removing some .align 16 from
> nospec-branch.h?
>
> The correct version has been backported to 4.9 and 4.4 releases
> already; if you pulled in an early version directly from tip/x86/pti
> then I'd recommend you drop it and pull in the real version instead.
Thanks for the clarification, David!
I'm going to pull the latest version from Linus's master branch.
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists