[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1516911228-5293-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:13:42 -0800
From: kan.liang@...el.com
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: acme@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V6 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: correct fixed counter index check for NHM
From: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>
For Nehalem and Westmere, there is only one fixed counter for W-Box.
There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED.
It is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter.
The code quality issue will bring problem when new counter index is
introduced.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>
---
No changes since V5
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_nhmex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_nhmex.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_nhmex.c
index 93e7a83..173e267 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_nhmex.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_nhmex.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void nhmex_uncore_msr_enable_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct p
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
- if (hwc->idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+ if (hwc->idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, NHMEX_PMON_CTL_EN_BIT0);
else if (box->pmu->type->event_mask & NHMEX_PMON_CTL_EN_BIT0)
wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, hwc->config | NHMEX_PMON_CTL_EN_BIT22);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists