[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <151691843634.9300.9473350782231091007@takondra-t460s>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:13:56 -0800
From: Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@...co.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
James McMechan <james.w.mcmechan@...il.com>,
initramfs@...r.kernel.org, Victor Kamensky <kamensky@...co.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
xe-linux-external@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] Documentation: add newcx initramfs format description
Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2018-01-25 13:02:49)
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@...co.com> wrote:
>
> > For initramfs nanoseconds field can be ignored during
> > unpacking.
>
> That sounds like a pointless microoptimization. Most likely we won't ever
> need the nanoseconds in the initramfs, but it's trivial to just copy them
> into the right field, and not adding that one source line would probably
> involve adding a one-line source comment to explain the omission ;-)
Agree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists