linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 16/36] nds32: DMA mapping API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEbi=3fwCnFXmYKPEiDiqoGFujqRD0bPrPAgqtiTkO_vuX25dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:45:18 +0800
From:   Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 16/36] nds32: DMA mapping API

Hi, Arnd:

2018-01-24 19:36 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Arnd:
>>
>> 2018-01-23 16:23 GMT+08:00 Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>:
>>> Hi, Arnd:
>>>
>>> 2018-01-18 18:26 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Greentime Hu <greentime@...estech.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds support for the DMA mapping API. It uses dma_map_ops for
>>>>> flexibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime@...estech.com>
>>>>
>>>> I'm still unhappy about the way the cache flushes are done here as discussed
>>>> before. It's not a show-stopped, but no Ack from me.
>>>
>>> How about this implementation?
>
>> I am not sure if I understand it correctly.
>> I list all the combinations.
>>
>> RAM to DEVICE
>>     before DMA => writeback cache
>>     after DMA => nop
>>
>> DEVICE to RAM
>>     before DMA => nop
>>     after DMA => invalidate cache
>>
>> static void consistent_sync(void *vaddr, size_t size, int direction, int master)
>> {
>>         unsigned long start = (unsigned long)vaddr;
>>         unsigned long end = start + size;
>>
>>         if (master == FOR_CPU) {
>>                 switch (direction) {
>>                 case DMA_TO_DEVICE:
>>                         break;
>>                 case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
>>                 case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
>>                         cpu_dma_inval_range(start, end);
>>                         break;
>>                 default:
>>                         BUG();
>>                 }
>>         } else {
>>                 /* FOR_DEVICE */
>>                 switch (direction) {
>>                 case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
>>                         break;
>>                 case DMA_TO_DEVICE:
>>                 case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
>>                         cpu_dma_wb_range(start, end);
>>                         break;
>>                 default:
>>                         BUG();
>>                 }
>>         }
>> }
>
> That looks reasonable enough, but it does depend on a number of factors,
> and the dma-mapping.h implementation is not just about cache flushes.
>
> As I don't know the microarchitecture, can you answer these questions:
>
> - are caches always write-back, or could they be write-through?
Yes, we can config it to write-back or write-through.

> - can the cache be shared with another CPU or a device?
No, we don't support it.

> - if the cache is shared, is it always coherent, never coherent, or
> either of them?
We don't support SMP and the device will access memory through bus. I
think the cache is not shared.

> - could the same memory be visible at different physical addresses
>   and have conflicting caches?
We currently don't have such kind of SoC memory map.

> - is the CPU physical address always the same as the address visible to the
>   device?
Yes, it is always the same unless the CPU uses local memory. The
physical address of local memory will overlap the original bus
address.
I think the local memory case can be ignored because we don't use it for now.

> - are there devices that can only see a subset of the physical memory?
All devices are able to see the whole physical memory in our current
SoC, but I think other SoC may support such kind of HW behavior.

> - can there be an IOMMU?
No.

> - are there write-buffers in the CPU that might need to get flushed before
>   flushing the cache?
Yes, there are write-buffers in front of CPU caches but it should be
transparent to SW. We don't need to flush it.

> - could cache lines be loaded speculatively or with read-ahead while
>   a buffer is owned by a device?
No.