[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496b6a31-47b1-483a-f096-32fcdee34501@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:11:18 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
georgi.djakov@...aro.org, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
stummala@...eaurora.org, venkatg@...eaurora.org,
pramod.gurav@...aro.org, jeremymc@...hat.com,
Krishna Konda <kkonda@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: support voltage pad switching
On 18/01/18 10:05, Vijay Viswanath wrote:
> From: Krishna Konda <kkonda@...eaurora.org>
>
> The PADs for sdhc controller are dual-voltage that support 3v/1.8v.
> Those PADs have a control signal (io_pad_pwr_switch/mode18 ) that
> indicates whether the PAD works in 3v or 1.8v.
>
> SDHC core on msm platforms should have IO_PAD_PWR_SWITCH bit set/unset
> based on actual voltage used for IO lines. So when power irq is
> triggered for io high or io low, the driver should check the voltages
> supported and set the pad accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Konda <kkonda@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@...eaurora.org>
> ---
Not sure why this is RFC, but for sdhci:
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 5c23e92..f5728a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
> #define CORE_HC_MCLK_SEL_DFLT (2 << 8)
> #define CORE_HC_MCLK_SEL_HS400 (3 << 8)
> #define CORE_HC_MCLK_SEL_MASK (3 << 8)
> +#define CORE_IO_PAD_PWR_SWITCH_EN (1 << 15)
> +#define CORE_IO_PAD_PWR_SWITCH (1 << 16)
> #define CORE_HC_SELECT_IN_EN BIT(18)
> #define CORE_HC_SELECT_IN_HS400 (6 << 19)
> #define CORE_HC_SELECT_IN_MASK (7 << 19)
> @@ -1166,6 +1168,35 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
> */
> writel_relaxed(irq_ack, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);
>
> + /*
> + * SDHC has core_mem and hc_mem device memory and these memory
> + * addresses do not fall within 1KB region. Hence, any update to
> + * core_mem address space would require an mb() to ensure this gets
> + * completed before its next update to registers within hc_mem.
> + */
> + mb();
> + /*
> + * We should unset IO PAD PWR switch only if the register write can
> + * set IO lines high and the regulator also switches to 3 V.
> + * Else, we should keep the IO PAD PWR switch set.
> + * This is applicable to certain targets where eMMC vccq supply is only
> + * 1.8V. In such targets, even during REQ_IO_HIGH, the IO PAD PWR
> + * switch must be kept set to reflect actual regulator voltage. This
> + * way, during initialization of controllers with only 1.8V, we will
> + * set the IO PAD bit without waiting for a REQ_IO_LOW.
> + */
> + if ((io_level & REQ_IO_HIGH) && (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_3_0V_SUPPORT))
> + writel_relaxed((readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC) &
> + ~CORE_IO_PAD_PWR_SWITCH), host->ioaddr +
> + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + else if ((io_level & REQ_IO_LOW) ||
> + (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_1_8V_SUPPORT))
> + writel_relaxed((readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC) |
> + CORE_IO_PAD_PWR_SWITCH), host->ioaddr +
> + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + /* Ensure that the IO PAD switches are updated before proceeding */
> + mb();
> +
> if (pwr_state)
> msm_host->curr_pwr_state = pwr_state;
> if (io_level)
> @@ -1518,6 +1549,13 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Set the PAD_PWR_SWITCH_EN bit so that the PAD_PWR_SWITCH bit can
> + * be used as required later on.
> + */
> + writel_relaxed((readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC) |
> + CORE_IO_PAD_PWR_SWITCH_EN), host->ioaddr +
> + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC);
> + /*
> * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of
> * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq
> * interrupt in GIC, any pending power irq interrupt should be
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists