linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add a reserved-gpio-ranges property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:20:26 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add a reserved-gpio-ranges
 property

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 17:13 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Some qcom platforms make some GPIOs or pins unavailable for use
> by non-secure operating systems, and thus reading or writing the
> registers for those pins will cause access control issues.
> Introduce a DT property to describe the set of GPIOs that are
> available for use so that higher level OSes are able to know what
> pins to avoid reading/writing.

>  	gpio-controller;
>  	#gpio-cells = <2>;
>  	ngpios = <18>;
> +	reserved-gpio-ranges = <0 4>, <12 2>;

What about preserving namespace, i.e.

gpio-reserved-ranges vs. your variant?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy