[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd064e0c-d828-6555-7bf5-768fc2c1b142@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:22 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, asathyak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] irqchip: qcom: add support for PDC interrupt
controller
On 25/01/18 20:05, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25 2018 at 18:43 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
[...]
>> It may have some advantages to decentralize but will that not cause
>> issues in complex systems ? I assume even modem and other processors can
>> access and configure these wakeup interrupts. What happens if 2 such
>> processors try to access it at the same time ?
>>
> Every processor in the SoC has its own PDC and does exactly the same
> thing in SW. The hardware blocks are replicated for each of the
> 'subsystem' and they behave similarly.
>
Ah that explains a lot.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists