[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1516981345-8202-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:42:25 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: tim@...erelk.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: paride: on26: Replace mdelay with msleep in on26_test_port
After checking all possible call chains to on26_test_port() here,
my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context,
namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
And on26_test_port() is only called by pi_probe_unit() that calls
wait_event() through pi_claim(),
so it indicates that on26_test_port() can call functions that can sleep.
Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/block/paride/on26.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/paride/on26.c b/drivers/block/paride/on26.c
index 95ba256..3240d6f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/paride/on26.c
+++ b/drivers/block/paride/on26.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int on26_test_port( PIA *pi) /* hard reset */
on26_write_regr(pi,0,6,0xb0);
y = on26_read_regr(pi,0,7);
if (!((x&0x80)||(y&0x80))) break;
- mdelay(100);
+ msleep(100);
}
if (i == RESET_WAIT)
--
1.7.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists