lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:16:34 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: sprd: Use 'spi_master_put()' instead of 'spi_controller_put()'

Hi Christophe,

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> 'spi_alloc_master()' calls should be balanced by a 'spi_master_put()' call.
>
> 'spi_controller_put()' is equivalent (see include/linux/spi/spi.h) but it
> is cleaner and more logical to use 'spi_master_put()'.

My intention was to phase out the spi_master_* names, and remove them
when there are no users left.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ