[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve-WpJ6kqdW3WZFpO6pnSPdnVidVJ3EhOM+Fvs2AstQxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 20:19:53 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Milan Stevanovic <milan.o.stevanovic@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: adc: driver for ti adc081s/adc101s/adc121s
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:32 PM, Milan Stevanovic
<milan.o.stevanovic@...il.com> wrote:
> Add Linux device driver for TI single-channel CMOS
> 8/10/12-bit analog-to-digital converter with a
> high-speed serial interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Milan Stevanovic <milan.o.stevanovic@...il.com>
> + * Analog Devices AD7466/7/8 AD7476/5/7/8 (A) SPI ADC driver
> + * TI ADC081S/ADC101S/ADC121S 8/10/12-bit SPI ADC driver
Guys, I'm not sure I understood this mix.
We have like few TI drivers here:
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc0832.c:352:module_spi_driver(adc0832_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc084s021.c:269:module_spi_driver(adc084s021_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c:343:module_spi_driver(adc108s102_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc12138.c:547:module_spi_driver(adc12138_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c:211:module_spi_driver(adc128_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc161s626.c:276:module_spi_driver(ti_adc_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c:519:module_spi_driver(ti_ads7950_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c:481:module_spi_driver(ads8688_driver);
drivers/iio/adc/ti-tlc4541.c:266:module_spi_driver(tlc4541_driver);
What's wrong with them?
Is it here code duplication between two vendors?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists