linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:11:56 +0000
From:   David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>,
        Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict
 Indirect Branch Speculation

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 14:02 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> 
> -ECONFUSED, see ==>
> 
> Is this incorrect then?
> I see:
> 
> 241          * Skylake era CPUs have a separate issue with *underflow* of the       
> 242          * RSB, when they will predict 'ret' targets from the generic BTB.      
> 243          * The proper mitigation for this is IBRS. If IBRS is not supported     
> 244          * or deactivated in favour of retpolines the RSB fill on context       
> 245          * switch is required.                                                  
> 246          */                       

No, that's correct (well, except that it's kind of written for a world
where Linus is going to let IBRS anywhere near his kernel, and could
survive being rephrased a little :)

The RSB-stuffing on context switch (or kernel entry) is one of a
*litany* of additional hacks we need on Skylake to make retpolines
safe.

We were adding the RSB-stuffing in this case *anyway* for !SMEP, so it
was trivial enough to add in the (|| Skylake) condition while we were
at it.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)