linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180127134239.GA25029@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:42:43 -0500
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
To:     "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>,
        Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict
 Indirect Branch Speculation

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 07:11:47PM +0000, Hansen, Dave wrote:
> The need for RSB stuffing in all the various scenarios and what the heck it actually mitigates is freakishly complicated.  I've tried to write it all down in one place: https://goo.gl/pXbvBE

Thank you for sharing that.

One question on the third from the top (' RSB Stuff (16) After
irq/nmi/#PF/...').

It says that :"Return from interrupt path (more than 16 deep) can empty
RSB".

Just to clarify - you mean all the returns ('ret') that are happening after
we call do_IRQ and the stack unwinds - but before we do an 'iret' correct?

I am 99% sure that is what you mean, but just confirming as one could read
this as: 'Need to do RSB after an iret' (say you are in the kernel
and then get an interrupt and iret back to kernel).