[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8RAzwpcGqrSxsegYnVgfFQCkYp+sgaPzm8906A4QMLCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:04:49 +0000
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] firmware/psci: Expose PSCI conduit
On 26 January 2018 at 14:28, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
> In order to call into the firmware to apply workarounds, it is
> useful to find out whether we're using HVC or SMC. Let's expose
> this through the psci_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/psci.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index 8b25d31e8401..570187e5d084 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ bool psci_tos_resident_on(int cpu)
> return cpu == resident_cpu;
> }
>
> -struct psci_operations psci_ops;
> +struct psci_operations psci_ops = {
> + .conduit = PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE,
> +};
>
> typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
> unsigned long, unsigned long);
> @@ -210,6 +212,20 @@ static unsigned long psci_migrate_info_up_cpu(void)
> 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
> +static void set_conduit(enum psci_conduit conduit)
> +{
> + switch (conduit) {
> + case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC:
> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
> + break;
> + case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC:
> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
> + break;
I get a GCC warning here about PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE not being handled.
> + }
> +
> + psci_ops.conduit = conduit;
> +}
> +
> static int get_set_conduit_method(struct device_node *np)
> {
> const char *method;
> @@ -222,9 +238,9 @@ static int get_set_conduit_method(struct device_node *np)
> }
>
> if (!strcmp("hvc", method)) {
> - invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
> + set_conduit(PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC);
> } else if (!strcmp("smc", method)) {
> - invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
> + set_conduit(PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC);
> } else {
> pr_warn("invalid \"method\" property: %s\n", method);
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -654,9 +670,9 @@ int __init psci_acpi_init(void)
> pr_info("probing for conduit method from ACPI.\n");
>
> if (acpi_psci_use_hvc())
> - invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
> + set_conduit(PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC);
> else
> - invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
> + set_conduit(PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC);
>
> return psci_probe();
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/psci.h b/include/linux/psci.h
> index f724fd8c78e8..f2679e5faa4f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psci.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ bool psci_tos_resident_on(int cpu);
> int psci_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu);
> int psci_cpu_suspend_enter(unsigned long index);
>
> +enum psci_conduit {
> + PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE,
> + PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC,
> + PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC,
> +};
> +
> struct psci_operations {
> u32 (*get_version)(void);
> int (*cpu_suspend)(u32 state, unsigned long entry_point);
> @@ -34,6 +40,7 @@ struct psci_operations {
> int (*affinity_info)(unsigned long target_affinity,
> unsigned long lowest_affinity_level);
> int (*migrate_info_type)(void);
> + enum psci_conduit conduit;
> };
>
> extern struct psci_operations psci_ops;
> --
> 2.14.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists