[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVSDj2MmTzbxgZeBx94EKdcRr6B_3Bh+Mb35XhBRPPGXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:37:57 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: convert unittest overlay devicetree source to
sugar syntax
Hi Frank,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:53 AM, <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>
> The unittest-data overlays have been pulled into proper overlay
> devicetree source files without changing their format. The
> next step is to convert them to use sugar syntax instead of
> hand coding overlay fragments structure.
Cool! I had heard about the new syntax, but hadn't realized it was merged in
v4.15-rc1.
Have you used your overlay_convert_old_to_new script to convert them?
> A few of the overlays can not be converted because they test
> absolute target paths in the overlay fragment. dtc does not
> generate this type of target:
> overlay_0.dts
> overlay_1.dts
> overlay_12.dts
> overlay_13.dts
And I guess you want to keep at least a few tests using the non-sugar syntax
anyway?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists