lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b7c9826-7327-9675-8e36-53d0ea5c0059@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:28:11 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Per-VCPU MSR bitmaps patches - topic branch for
 x86/pti

On 29/01/2018 13:53, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Hm, we are pushing the other bits through tip/x86/pti, which is still
> based on 4.14 so that everything can be backported easily. I was
> expecting to be able to pull a clean 4.14-based tree

Anything 4.14-based would have had conflicts all over due to the changes
that have already gone in for tip/x86/pti.  These three patches do
cherry-pick cleanly on top of 4.14.

If you give me the tree and commit id that you want me to use as a base,
I can rebase and give you a new topic branch.

Thanks,

Paolo

> which you had
> *also* pulled into the latest kvm.git and resolved any merge issues...
> but I just pulled a whole bunch of unrelated post-4.14 changes into my
> working tree.
> 
> How do you want to handle this? 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ