linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: stm32: Add DSI clock for STM32F469 Board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180129185624.zesocq2siiikwnog@rob-hp-laptop>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:56:24 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     gabriel.fernandez@...com
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
        philippe.cornu@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, gabriel.fernandez.st@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: stm32: Add DSI clock for STM32F469 Board

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 03:49:40PM +0100, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> 
> This patch adds DSI clock for STM32F469 board
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                 | 11 ++++++++++-
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> index da44f8d..3c28798 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ struct stm32f4_pll_data {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct stm32f4_pll_data stm32f469_pll[MAX_PLL_DIV] = {
> -	{ PLL,	   50, { "pll",	     "pll-q",    NULL	    } },
> +	{ PLL,	   50, { "pll",	     "pll-q",    "pll-r"    } },
>  	{ PLL_I2S, 50, { "plli2s-p", "plli2s-q", "plli2s-r" } },
>  	{ PLL_SAI, 50, { "pllsai-p", "pllsai-q", "pllsai-r" } },
>  };
> @@ -1047,6 +1047,8 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	"no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
>  };
>  
> +static const char *dsi_parent[2] = { NULL, "pll-r" };
> +
>  static const char *lcd_parent[1] = { "pllsai-r-div" };
>  
>  static const char *i2s_parents[2] = { "plli2s-r", NULL };
> @@ -1156,6 +1158,12 @@ struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>  		NO_GATE, 0,
>  		0
>  	},
> +	{
> +		CLK_F469_DSI, "dsi", dsi_parent, ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_parent),
> +		STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 29, 1,
> +		STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 27,
> +		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static const struct stm32_aux_clk stm32f746_aux_clk[] = {
> @@ -1450,6 +1458,7 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>  	stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map;
>  
>  	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
> +	dsi_parent[0] = hse_clk;
>  
>  	i2s_in_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 1);
>  
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h
> index 4d523b0..58d8b51 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h
> @@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
>  #define CLK_SAIQ_PDIV		13
>  #define CLK_HSI			14
>  #define CLK_SYSCLK		15
> +#define CLK_F469_DSI		16
>  
> -#define END_PRIMARY_CLK		16
> +#define END_PRIMARY_CLK		17
>  
>  #define CLK_HDMI_CEC		16
>  #define CLK_SPDIF		17

This looks suspicious. What's the relationship of these clocks?

Rob