[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0e28fcd-8e65-b7b8-7fcf-c95a680b11f4@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:24:25 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 26 (gpu/drm/i915/)
On 01/29/2018 12:45 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On 01/25/2018 06:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20180119:
>>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.o: In function `intel_backlight_device_register':
>> intel_panel.c:(.text+0x28d4): undefined reference to `backlight_device_register'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.o: In function `intel_backlight_device_unregister':
>> intel_panel.c:(.text+0x2991): undefined reference to `backlight_device_unregister'
>>
>> when CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=m
>> and CONFIG_DRM_I915=y
>
> I don't deny there's an issue with i915 selecting
> CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE. I'm afraid previous attempts at fixing
> that have been a rabbit hole; new config errors pop up
> elsewhere. [citation needed].
>
> That said, I thought we had enough duct tape in the Kconfig to keep the
> issues at bay. Since you're replying to linux-next, are you saying this
> is new? I wonder if something's changed elsewhere.
Hi Jani,
I don't know that it's new. It just popped up in a linux-next randconfig build.
I'll look at the config dependencies a bit, but I do recall the rabbit hole
and I don't want to look or go there.
The randconfig file is attached if you are interested in checking it.
thanks,
--
~Randy
View attachment "config-r5172" of type "text/plain" (119747 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists