[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180129123828.642934967@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:56:48 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 20/71] ARM: net: bpf: fix LDX instructions
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
commit ec19e02b343db991d2d1610c409efefebf4e2ca9 upstream.
When the source and destination register are identical, our JIT does not
generate correct code, which leads to kernel oopses.
Fix this by (a) generating more efficient code, and (b) making use of
the temporary earlier if we will overwrite the address register.
Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -913,33 +913,53 @@ static inline void emit_str_r(const u8 d
}
/* dst = *(size*)(src + off) */
-static inline void emit_ldx_r(const u8 dst, const u8 src, bool dstk,
- const s32 off, struct jit_ctx *ctx, const u8 sz){
+static inline void emit_ldx_r(const u8 dst[], const u8 src, bool dstk,
+ s32 off, struct jit_ctx *ctx, const u8 sz){
const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
- u8 rd = dstk ? tmp[1] : dst;
+ const u8 *rd = dstk ? tmp : dst;
u8 rm = src;
+ s32 off_max;
- if (off) {
+ if (sz == BPF_H)
+ off_max = 0xff;
+ else
+ off_max = 0xfff;
+
+ if (off < 0 || off > off_max) {
emit_a32_mov_i(tmp[0], off, false, ctx);
emit(ARM_ADD_R(tmp[0], tmp[0], src), ctx);
rm = tmp[0];
+ off = 0;
+ } else if (rd[1] == rm) {
+ emit(ARM_MOV_R(tmp[0], rm), ctx);
+ rm = tmp[0];
}
switch (sz) {
- case BPF_W:
- /* Load a Word */
- emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd, rm, 0), ctx);
+ case BPF_B:
+ /* Load a Byte */
+ emit(ARM_LDRB_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+ emit_a32_mov_i(dst[0], 0, dstk, ctx);
break;
case BPF_H:
/* Load a HalfWord */
- emit(ARM_LDRH_I(rd, rm, 0), ctx);
+ emit(ARM_LDRH_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+ emit_a32_mov_i(dst[0], 0, dstk, ctx);
break;
- case BPF_B:
- /* Load a Byte */
- emit(ARM_LDRB_I(rd, rm, 0), ctx);
+ case BPF_W:
+ /* Load a Word */
+ emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+ emit_a32_mov_i(dst[0], 0, dstk, ctx);
+ break;
+ case BPF_DW:
+ /* Load a Double Word */
+ emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd[1], rm, off), ctx);
+ emit(ARM_LDR_I(rd[0], rm, off + 4), ctx);
break;
}
if (dstk)
- emit(ARM_STR_I(rd, ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst)), ctx);
+ emit(ARM_STR_I(rd[1], ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst[1])), ctx);
+ if (dstk && sz == BPF_DW)
+ emit(ARM_STR_I(rd[0], ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst[0])), ctx);
}
/* Arithmatic Operation */
@@ -1440,22 +1460,7 @@ exit:
rn = sstk ? tmp2[1] : src_lo;
if (sstk)
emit(ARM_LDR_I(rn, ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(src_lo)), ctx);
- switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
- case BPF_W:
- /* Load a Word */
- case BPF_H:
- /* Load a Half-Word */
- case BPF_B:
- /* Load a Byte */
- emit_ldx_r(dst_lo, rn, dstk, off, ctx, BPF_SIZE(code));
- emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, dstk, ctx);
- break;
- case BPF_DW:
- /* Load a double word */
- emit_ldx_r(dst_lo, rn, dstk, off, ctx, BPF_W);
- emit_ldx_r(dst_hi, rn, dstk, off+4, ctx, BPF_W);
- break;
- }
+ emit_ldx_r(dst, rn, dstk, off, ctx, BPF_SIZE(code));
break;
/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + imm)) */
case BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists