[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180129123847.757904100@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:56:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 05/74] x86/microcode/intel: Fix BDW late-loading revision check
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
The backport of commit b94b73733171 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW
late-loading with a revision check") to 4.4-stable deleted a "return true"
statement. This bug is not present upstream or other stable branches.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static bool is_blacklisted(unsigned int
c->microcode < 0x0b000021) {
pr_err_once("Erratum BDF90: late loading with revision < 0x0b000021 (0x%x) disabled.\n", c->microcode);
pr_err_once("Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n");
+ return true;
}
return false;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists