[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180129123842.751700262@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:57:18 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 54/66] tun: fix a memory leak for tfile->tx_array
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 4df0bfc79904b7169dc77dcce44598b1545721f9 ]
tfile->tun could be detached before we close the tun fd,
via tun_detach_all(), so it should not be used to check for
tfile->tx_array.
As Jason suggested, we probably have to clean it up
unconditionally both in __tun_deatch() and tun_detach_all(),
but this requires to check if it is initialized or not.
Currently skb_array_cleanup() doesn't have such a check,
so I check it in the caller and introduce a helper function,
it is a bit ugly but we can always improve it in net-next.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Fixes: 1576d9860599 ("tun: switch to use skb array for tx")
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -525,6 +525,14 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_f
skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue);
}
+static void tun_cleanup_tx_array(struct tun_file *tfile)
+{
+ if (tfile->tx_array.ring.queue) {
+ skb_array_cleanup(&tfile->tx_array);
+ memset(&tfile->tx_array, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_array));
+ }
+}
+
static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
{
struct tun_file *ntfile;
@@ -566,8 +574,7 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file
tun->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
unregister_netdevice(tun->dev);
}
- if (tun)
- skb_array_cleanup(&tfile->tx_array);
+ tun_cleanup_tx_array(tfile);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
}
}
@@ -606,11 +613,13 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_de
/* Drop read queue */
tun_queue_purge(tfile);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
+ tun_cleanup_tx_array(tfile);
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(tfile, tmp, &tun->disabled, next) {
tun_enable_queue(tfile);
tun_queue_purge(tfile);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
+ tun_cleanup_tx_array(tfile);
}
BUG_ON(tun->numdisabled != 0);
@@ -2363,6 +2372,8 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *in
sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
+ memset(&tfile->tx_array, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_array));
+
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists