[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3af3f81-da51-6534-2ebd-0adf88677d47@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:14:45 -0800
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: convert unittest overlay devicetree source to
sugar syntax
On 01/29/18 02:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:53 AM, <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>>
>> The unittest-data overlays have been pulled into proper overlay
>> devicetree source files without changing their format. The
>> next step is to convert them to use sugar syntax instead of
>> hand coding overlay fragments structure.
>
> Cool! I had heard about the new syntax, but hadn't realized it was merged in
> v4.15-rc1.
>
> Have you used your overlay_convert_old_to_new script to convert them?
>
>> A few of the overlays can not be converted because they test
>> absolute target paths in the overlay fragment. dtc does not
>> generate this type of target:
>> overlay_0.dts
>> overlay_1.dts
>> overlay_12.dts
>> overlay_13.dts
>
> And I guess you want to keep at least a few tests using the non-sugar syntax
> anyway?
Not really. But not something I care about at the moment.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists