[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2ad9f6f-bf66-10bc-6156-cb006ab9447d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:01:38 -0800
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: change overlay apply input data from EDT to FDT
On 01/29/18 06:42, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:53 PM, <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>>
>> Move duplicating and unflattening of an overlay flattened devicetree
>> (FDT) into the overlay application code. To accomplish this,
>> of_overlay_apply() is replaced by of_overlay_fdt_apply().
>>
>> The copy of the FDT (aka "duplicate FDT") now belongs to devicetree
>> code, which is thus responsible for freeing the duplicate FDT. The
>> caller of of_overlay_fdt_apply() remains responsible for freeing the
>> original FDT.
>>
>> The unflattened device tree (aka expanded device tree, EDT) now
>
> Not really a fan of a new acronym.
>
>> belongs to devicetree code, which is thus responsible for freeing
>> the EDT.
>>
>> These ownership changes prevent early freeing of the duplicated FDT
>> or the EDT, which could result in use after free errors.
>>
>> of_overlay_fdt_apply() is a private function for the anticipated
>> overlay loader.
>>
>> Update unittest.c to use of_overlay_fdt_apply() instead of
>> of_overlay_apply().
>>
>> Move overlay fragments from artificial locations in
>> drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-overlay.dtsi into one devicetree
>> source file per overlay. This led to changes in
>> drivers/of/unitest-data/Makefile and drivers/of/unitest.c.
I should have reversed the cause and effect in that sentence to
instead be:
The changes to drivers/of/unittest.c require the test overlays
to be in FDT form instead of unflattened devicetree form. Move
overlay fragments from artificial locations in
drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-overlay.dtsi into one
devicetree source file per overlay and thus create
one FDT per overlay.
> Why the rearranging? That should be a separate patch.
Bisectability.
I can make the changes to the devicetree files in a second patch.
After the first patch, there will be 29 self test fails.
I will make the change unless you respond back to this saying not to.
>> - Add overlay directives to the overlay devicetree source files so
>> that dtc will compile them as true overlays into one FDT data
>> chunk per overlay.
>
> For this?
>
>> - Set CFLAGS for drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts so that
>> symbols will be generated for overlay resolution of overlays
>> that are no longer artificially contained in testcases.dts
>>
>> - Unflatten and apply each unittest overlay FDT using
>> of_overlay_fdt_apply().
>>
>> - Enable the of_resolve_phandles() check for whether the overlay
>> EDT is detached. This check was previously disabled because the
>> overlays from tests-overlay.dtsi were not unflattened into detached
>> trees.
>>
>> - Other changes to unittest.c infrastructure to manage multiple test
>> FDTs built into the kernel image (access by name instead of
>> arbitrary number).
>>
>> - of_unittest_overlay_high_level(): previously unused code to add
>> properties from the overlay_base devicetree to the live tree
>> was triggered by the restructuring of tests-overlay.dtsi and thus
>> testcases.dts. This exposed two bugs: (1) the need to dup a
>> property before adding it, and (2) property 'name' is
>> auto-generated in the unflatten code and thus will be a duplicate
>> in the __symbols__ node - do not treat this duplicate as an error.
>>
>> Errors while developing the patch exposed inadequate error messages
>> to debug problems when overlay devicetree fragment nodes contain
>> an invalid target path. Improved the messages in find_target_node().
>
> Sounds like another separate patch.
Will do.
>
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists