[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0QxQE=GM=SGPtT82=UreiqsgY6uMThvQ_woA3rjK0zjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:24:48 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Yong Deng <yong.deng@...ewell.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>, megous@...ous.com,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] media: V3s: Add support for Allwinner CSI.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:34:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Linus Walleij
>> <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> > <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 05:14:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> At one point we had discussed adding a 'dma-masters' property that
>> lists all the buses on which a device can be a dma master, and
>> the respective properties of those masters (iommu, coherency,
>> offset, ...).
>>
>> IIRC at the time we decided that we could live without that complexity,
>> but perhaps we cannot.
>
> Are you talking about this ?
> https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt#L41
>
> It doesn't seem to be related to that issue to me. And in our
> particular cases, all the devices are DMA masters, the RAM is just
> mapped to another address.
No, that's not the one I was thinking of. The idea at the time was much
more generic, and not limited to dma engines. I don't recall the details,
but I think that Thierry was either involved or made the proposal at the
time.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists