[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180130100444.GU18649@localhost>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:34:45 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: "Yang, Shunyong" <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com>
Cc: "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: dmatest: change symbolic permissions
to octal values
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:26:40AM +0000, Yang, Shunyong wrote:
> Hi, Vinod
>
> On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 10:18 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 06:44:40PM +0800, Yang Shunyong wrote:
> > >
> > > Current coding style prefers octal permissions values. This patch
> > > changes symbolic permissions to octal values.
> > Is this preference documented anywhere?
> >
>
> When using symbolic permissions like "S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR". The
> checkpatch.pl will output some warnings to suggest to use octal values.
> I quote following lines from checkpatch.pl,
>
> # check for uses of S_<PERMS> that could be octal for readability
> ...
> if (WARN("SYMBOLIC_PERMS",
> "Symbolic permissions '$oval' are not
> preferred. Consider using octal permissions '$octal'.\n" . $herecurr)
> &&
It is a warning and a preference. And I don't prefer changing code for no
benefit. Sorry but I am not considering this change
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists