[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1517319322.6724.4.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:35:22 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Use a recently used CPU as an idle
candidate and the basis for SIS
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 14:25 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 02:15:44PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 12:57 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:50:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mel, what hardware are you testing this on?
> > >
> > > The primary one was a single socket skylake machine with 8 threads (HT
> > > enabled).
> >
> > I took it for a spin in a 2 x Gold 6152 box.
>
> Can you translate that marketing speak for a simpleton like me? That's
> what we should've called SKL-EP, right?
Um um.. danged if I know. It's SKL, w. 22 cores each + SMT.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists