[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801301535180.1797@nanos>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:35:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] x86/irq: Count Hyper-V reenlightenment
interrupts
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2018-01-29 22:48+0100, Thomas Gleixner:
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > > 2018-01-24 14:23+0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov:
> > > > Hyper-V reenlightenment interrupts arrive when the VM is migrated, we're
> > > > not supposed to see many of them. However, it may be important to know
> > > > that the event has happened in case we have L2 nested guests.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > I think the expectation is that this series will go through the KVM
> > > tree. Would you prefer a topic branch?
> >
> > Is there any dependency outside of plain 4.15? If not, I'll put it into
> > x86/hyperv and let KVM folks pull it over.
>
> There isn't; we'll wait for x86/hyperv, thanks.
Will be there tomorrow. I'll let you know.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists