linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Lock mmap_sem when calling migrate_pages() in do_move_pages_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180130161025.GH21609@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:10:25 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
Cc:     Zi Yan <zi.yan@...t.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lock mmap_sem when calling migrate_pages() in
 do_move_pages_to_node()

On Tue 30-01-18 10:52:58, Zi Yan wrote:
> 
> 
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 29-01-18 22:00:11, Zi Yan wrote:
> >> From: Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
> >>
> >> migrate_pages() requires at least down_read(mmap_sem) to protect
> >> related page tables and VMAs from changing. Let's do it in
> >> do_page_moves() for both do_move_pages_to_node() and
> >> add_page_for_migration().
> >>
> >> Also add this lock requirement in the comment of migrate_pages().
> > 
> > This doesn't make much sense to me, to be honest. We are holding
> > mmap_sem for _read_ so we allow parallel updates like page faults
> > or unmaps. Therefore we are isolating pages prior to the migration.
> > 
> > The sole purpose of the mmap_sem in add_page_for_migration is to protect
> > from vma going away _while_ need it to get the proper page.
> 
> Then, I am wondering why we are holding mmap_sem when calling
> migrate_pages() in existing code.
> http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/mm/migrate.c#L1576

You mean in the original code? I strongly suspect this was to not take
it for each page.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs