linux-kernel - Re: [9/8] KVM: x86: limit MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL access based on CPUID availability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1517332457.18619.132.camel@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:14:17 +0000
From:   David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
        Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [9/8] KVM: x86: limit MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL access based on CPUID
 availability

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 08:57 -0800, Jim Mattson wrote:
> It's really hard to tell which patches are being proposed for which
> repositories, but assuming that everything else is correct, I don't
> think your condition is adequate. What if the physical CPU and the
> virtual CPU both have CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[26], but only the
> physical CPU has CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[27]? If the guest has write
> access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, it can set MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL[1]
> (STIBP), even though setting that bit in the guest should raise #GP.

Everything we're talking about here is for tip/x86/pti. Which I note
has just updated to be 4.15-based, although I thought it was going to
stay on 4.14 for now. So I've updated my tree at
http://git.infradead.org/linux-retpoline.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ibpb
accordingly.

You can always write to the STIBP bit without a #GP even when it's not
advertised/available.

There's a possibility that we'll want to always trap and *prevent*
that, instead of passing through — because doing so will also have an
effect on the HT siblings. But as discussed, I wanted to get the basics
working before exploring the complex IBRS/STIBP interactions. This much
should be OK to start with.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)