[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdsDAbgJ1XmhaxA5C8FTcYX7tBa4x_Y4ZYk6Sub510nqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:38:19 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Steve Presser <steve@...ssers.name>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Steve Presser <steve@...ssers.name> wrote:
> Andy,
>
> Where did the assertion the second device is a magnetometer come from? Just
> the data sheet?
Yep. See chapter 8.2. Isn't enough proof? Or you believe in two
accelerometers with off-by-one conflicting address on a cheap laptop
with left unused two magnetometers on the same time?
And we have a driver for magnetometer separately.
So, it looks like we need to move ACPI ID to a new "kinda I2C mfd" IIO
driver under drivers/iio/imu/bmc150_i2c.c
> Steve
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018, 12:05 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Jonathan Cameron
>> > <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:07:02 +0200
>> >> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> > But that would take much longer. Feel free to propose it and a
>> >>> > patch
>> >>> > removing the ifdef fun if you like!
>> >
>> >>> Where can I see the patch?
>> >
>> >> Doh. I clearly forgot to push out. Should be able to push to
>> >> iio.git on kernel.org later.
>> >
>> > Thanks, I can see it now.
>> >
>> > This patch almost wrong. Not by functionality it brings, but by style.
>>
>> Oy vey, the second device is *not* accelerometer, it is a magnetometer
>> [1].
>>
>> [1]: https://www.mouser.com/ds/2/783/BST-BMC150-DS000-04-786477.pdf
>>
>> > I'll send soon a series of fixes to the driver (compile tested only)
>> > to provide my view on the matters.
>> >
>> > P.S. In the future (I have some kind of deja vu I have told this
>> > already to someone), please, Cc one or more of Rafael, Mika and/or me
>> > for ACPI matters.
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists