[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k1vz3ywa.fsf@keithp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:55:01 -0800
From: "Keith Packard" <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Check for lessee in DROP_MASTER ioctl
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:51:59PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Don't let a lessee control what the current DRM master is set to;
>> that's the job of the "real" master. Otherwise, the lessee would
>> disable all access to master operations for the owner and all lessees
>> under it.
>>
>> This matches the same check made in the SET_MASTER ioctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
>
> Similar check for setmaster already exists, so looks all good. Do we have
> an igt for all this? Iirc there was one floating around, but no idea
> what's the status. Might also be good to resubmit them so i915 CI can run
> the tests (now that the code has landed).
I've got IGT tests for leasing which have been posted to dri-devel but I
don't think they've been reviewed. Looks like they could use some more
test cases; I didn't catch this one until I was playing with my 'xlease'
hack, which runs the X server on a leased FD.
> On the patch itself, minus lack of testcases:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Thanks!
--
-keith
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists