[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180130104833.a06e44c558c7ddc6b38e20b3@magewell.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:48:33 +0800
From: Yong <yong.deng@...ewell.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...com>,
Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@...renesas.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] media: V3s: Add support for Allwinner CSI.
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:49:14 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 01/29/2018 01:21 AM, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC features two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI CSI-2
> > interface and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not
> > documented in datasheet but by test and guess.
> >
> > This patch implement a v4l2 framework driver for it.
> >
> > Currently, the driver only support the parallel interface. MIPI-CSI2,
> > ISP's support are not included in this patch.
> >
> > Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Deng <yong.deng@...ewell.com>
> > ---
>
>
> A previous version (I think v6) had a build error with the use of
> PHYS_OFFSET, so Kconfig was modified to depend on ARM and ARCH_SUNXI
> (one of which seems to be overkill). As is here, the COMPILE_TEST piece is
> meaningless for all arches except ARM. If you care enough for COMPILE_TEST
> (and I would), then you could make COMPILE_TEST useful on any arch by
> removing the "depends on ARM" (the ARCH_SUNXI takes care of that) and by
> having an alternate value for PHYS_OFFSET, like so:
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST) && !defined(PHYS_OFFSET)
> +#define PHYS_OFFSET 0
> +#endif
>
> With those 2 changes, the driver builds for me on x86_64.
I have considered this method.
But it's so sick to put these code in dirver (for my own). I mean
this is meaningless for the driver itself and make people confused.
I grepped the driver/ code and I found many drivers writing Kconfig
like this. For example:
ARM && COMPILE_TEST
MIPS && COMPILE_TEST
PPC64 && COMPILE_TEST
BTW, for my own, I do not care about COMPILE_TEST.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/Kconfig b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/Kconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f80c965
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > +config VIDEO_SUN6I_CSI
> > + tristate "Allwinner V3s Camera Sensor Interface driver"
> > + depends on ARM
> > + depends on VIDEO_V4L2 && COMMON_CLK && VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API && HAS_DMA
> > + depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST
> > + select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_CONTIG
> > + select REGMAP_MMIO
> > + select V4L2_FWNODE
> > + ---help---
> > + Support for the Allwinner Camera Sensor Interface Controller on V3s.
>
> thanks,
> --
> ~Randy
Thanks,
Yong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists